Categorized | theory thursday

theory thursday: authenticity

Authenticity is something we strongly believe in for Fresno’s built environment.

What does Authenticity mean?

Authentic architecture is unique to a place, it seems to fit. The building fits in both it’s geographic place as well as it’s place in time. Olive Avenue in the Tower District is authentic. Our old brick buildings downtown are authentic. Fresno’s version of Mid Century Modern is authentic. I could go on.

What is not authentic?

A new building that poorly mimics historic Fresno architecture is not authentic. It actually does harm to the historic integrity of a neighborhood. Suburban buildings in downtown are inauthentic. Covering up an original facade is inauthentic. Examples will follow in later posts.

I’d like to make an analogy here. I’m sure you’re all familiar with CliffsNotes. These are pamphlets that summarize a book and give a student everything they need to write a shortcut book report for English class. They don’t read the book and they don’t have an original thought. That used to fly. English teachers however, have gotten hip to this and other internet shortcut sources. So if they’re on there game they’ll flunk the student’s shortcut paper.

I feel like development in Fresno, specifically downtown can be linked to this scenario. It seems as if some developers working downtown read the CliffsNotes about historic Fresno architecture and contemporary urban architecture and are trying to pass off some bad buildings on the Fresno public.

Unfortunately, the Fresno public is not yet hip to this. We’re like old teachers that don’t know how to use the internet. We are allowing this inauthentic shortcut architecture in our downtown. These buildings even get praise at times. Perhaps because we don’t know better or are afraid no developer will turn in their paper.

So this sounds serious right? Damage to the authenticity of our built environment is being done. And buildings are pretty permanent.

What do we do?

Well it starts here. We need to first determine what is authentic for us. Then we need to start grading these building designs being proposed. And we can’t be afraid the flunk some designs. Some may get their feelings hurt. But it will be a lesson to start doing their homework.

Specific examples of this idea will follow. In the meantime, what do you imagine authentic contemporary Fresno architecture looks like? What does it pull from the past? How does it respond to our climate? Where do it’s inspiration and concepts come from?

For more about authenticity see the Mayor’s Creative Economy Council report

This post was written by:

kiel - who has written 136 posts on archop.

Kiel Famellos-Schmidt is founder and curator of archop

Contact the author

2 Responses to “theory thursday: authenticity”

  1. Travis Sheridan says:

    I couldn’t agree more. The new brand platform adopted by the City is based on authentic assets. There are six brand pillars:
    1) Land Stewardship
    2) Authentic America
    3) Big City Amenities
    4) Small Town Ease
    5) Diverse Culture
    6) Innovation

    A brand platform workbook was developed to allow organizations to audit not only its marketing messages, but to audit policy and human resource efforts. A brand must be aligned in numerous areas to be believed.

    I think it would be a good exercise for the development community to see how their projects stack up against the Fresno brand.

  2. kiel says:

    Thanks for the pillars Travis.

    From my perspective, the development community is unstably balanced on few of the pillars listed.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Paprika Studios