<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: critique: L St. and San Joaquin Ave.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archop.org/2009/06/l-st-and-san-joaquin-ave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archop.org/2009/06/l-st-and-san-joaquin-ave/</link>
	<description>improving the built environment in the san joaquin valley</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kiel</title>
		<link>http://archop.org/2009/06/l-st-and-san-joaquin-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-2575</link>
		<dc:creator>kiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archop.org/?p=589#comment-2575</guid>
		<description>James,
Stucco (or cement plaster as it&#039;s called in the biz) is a valid material to use. It has its strengths and weaknesses like any material. But if it used as default with out any real reason, that is the danger. For large flat surfaces I feel panelized materials like sheet metal make more sense. I like seeing stucco on curved surfaces like the Woodward Park Library, or when thought is put into the texture.
Your other question easy. I&#039;d say there are more than enough people willing to invest in innovative urban design. Unfortunately, they maybe willing but not able. We have a desperately low amount of capital and resources in the San Joaquin Valley. That shows in allot of our buildings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,<br />
Stucco (or cement plaster as it&#8217;s called in the biz) is a valid material to use. It has its strengths and weaknesses like any material. But if it used as default with out any real reason, that is the danger. For large flat surfaces I feel panelized materials like sheet metal make more sense. I like seeing stucco on curved surfaces like the Woodward Park Library, or when thought is put into the texture.<br />
Your other question easy. I&#8217;d say there are more than enough people willing to invest in innovative urban design. Unfortunately, they maybe willing but not able. We have a desperately low amount of capital and resources in the San Joaquin Valley. That shows in allot of our buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://archop.org/2009/06/l-st-and-san-joaquin-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-2542</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archop.org/?p=589#comment-2542</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not an advocate for stucco, in fact I&#039;ve criticized Fresno for being over-saturated with it, but I have to ask: how is design defined? I mean, at one point, wasn&#039;t wood siding and interior paneling the norm?
Does the community overall have enough people willing to invest in properties that are outside the urbanized norm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an advocate for stucco, in fact I&#8217;ve criticized Fresno for being over-saturated with it, but I have to ask: how is design defined? I mean, at one point, wasn&#8217;t wood siding and interior paneling the norm?<br />
Does the community overall have enough people willing to invest in properties that are outside the urbanized norm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dani</title>
		<link>http://archop.org/2009/06/l-st-and-san-joaquin-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-2528</link>
		<dc:creator>Dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archop.org/?p=589#comment-2528</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Let&#039;s see some modern design--the juxtaposition between the actual arts/crafts and Italiante buildings in the area and a new, innovative facade would be stunning. This is the beginning of the suburbanization of downtown. With the stucco comes Starbucks...embrace your gritty, warehouse-laden self, downtown!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Let&#8217;s see some modern design&#8211;the juxtaposition between the actual arts/crafts and Italiante buildings in the area and a new, innovative facade would be stunning. This is the beginning of the suburbanization of downtown. With the stucco comes Starbucks&#8230;embrace your gritty, warehouse-laden self, downtown!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floydy</title>
		<link>http://archop.org/2009/06/l-st-and-san-joaquin-ave/comment-page-1/#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator>floydy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://archop.org/?p=589#comment-2490</guid>
		<description>throwing up tract home apartment complexes mitigates the potential that exists downtown to differentiate from every other part of town that is saturated with that garbage.

good design and &quot;stucco&quot; are synonyms to these people and as far as legacy is concerned that&#039;s very dangerous in the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>throwing up tract home apartment complexes mitigates the potential that exists downtown to differentiate from every other part of town that is saturated with that garbage.</p>
<p>good design and &#8220;stucco&#8221; are synonyms to these people and as far as legacy is concerned that&#8217;s very dangerous in the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
